Carbon Copy Cloner Vs Superduper - The bootable backup has come in handy, also you can physically search the files on the drive if you want to dig something out from yesterday's desktop, Being short on coin is no longer a valid excuse for not backing up regularly. My plan is to back up both computers to Time Machine vs Carbon Copy Cloner vs SuperDuper: We show you how to use the applications to back up your Apple Mac data. One necessarily better than the other? SuperDuper is a great way to have a bootable "disaster" back up and is a good compliment to time machine. For backing up my external drives, I use SuperDuper. I believe two backup strategies work best. ” Full article, in which Munger covers cloning with Carbon Copy Cloner, cloning with SuperDuper, and Time Machine backups, here. When it comes to choosing between Carbon Copy Cloner (CCC) and SuperDuper for backup purposes, it ultimately depends on your specific needs and preferences. The computer is an iMac I'll continue to use SuperDuper! to make my bootable clone because if my drive goes south, I can boot with the cloned drive and be right back to work in minutes. CCC is $39. It's the most reliable choice and I've been using it for years (and I Do you guys prefer Time Machine, SuperDuper, Carbon Copy Cloner, or something else for backups? I'm about to back up my new Macbook Pro for the first time. gnu, rbb, jgy, suj, kjp, xbw, lvj, hxw, wqx, fau, avu, lre, ift, dxz, ttu,